I'm about to say something that, at first, might scare some of you. Ready? Here goes: Feminism is a good thing.
No, really - I'm serious. Feminism can be a good thing. That brings me to the title of this post: Feminism v.s. Femi-nazi-isim. Femi-nazi-isim is a bad thing, obviously, but what is it? In its essence, femi-nazi-isim is today's feminism.
Femi-nazi-isim is best expressed using a real-life example, such as, say, Linda Hirshman:
"NEW YORK, June 20, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Linda Hirshman, a feminist US writer on cultural issues, has told the world why she thinks staying at home with the children is an occupation 'not worthy of the full time and talents of intelligent and educated human beings.' She complains at length that the feminist movement, while making some gains in public life through legal activism, has largely failed in the one area where it counts most: the family.
She upbraids women who stay at home for failing the feminist agenda, saying, 'They do not require a great intellect, they are not honored and they do not involve risks and the rewards that risk brings.'"
Ann Coulter put it very well when she said, “Hirshman isn't just expressing an opinion about what she thinks is best, she is saying that any woman who makes a choice different from what she espouses is unequivocally ‘wrong.’”
That's femi-nazi-isim. It isn't about giving power to women - in a way, it's about forcing power upon them - like it or not.
If a women wants to be a stay at home mother, she must be anti-femi-nazi - a traitor to women everywhere. How horrible of her to stay at home and care for her family.
In an article in the National Post, author Caitlin Flanagan said: "If you love your work and you love your child and you decide to give your child less of you to go to work, you missed something big and important and so did your child."
Flanagan is a staff writer for The New Yorker and the author of To Hell with All That: Fearing and Loathing Our Inner Housewife.
In her book, she points out that: "When a mother works, something is lost."
Of course, if femi-nazi-isim was about helping women, staying home would be her choice - and good for her if she makes it. But it isn't about helping - it's about 'empowering', which in the strange language of the femi-nazi's means 'getting careers and ditching family life, no ifs, ands, or buts.'
So what is feminism - what is the "good thing" I said it can be? Well, let's look at Eva Herman - a leading German TV moderator and anchorwoman:
"BERLIN, Germany, March 20, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com)...
Eva Herman published her account of the fatal flaws in a career-oriented lifestyle in a bestselling book entitled 'The Eva-Principle: Towards a New Femininity', released last year...
In The Eva-Principle, Herman tore open the issue of abortion as a violation of the woman, blaming pro-abortion laws for minimizing the trauma of abortion as nothing worse than going to the dentist.
Her book was founded on a rejection of the feminist goals of emancipation, career success and self-fulfillment, replacing them instead with the 'radical' goals of motherhood, home-maker and marriage-partner.
'Let's just say it loud,' Herman wrote. 'We women have overburdened ourselves -- we allowed ourselves to be too easily seduced by career opportunities.'"
Eva Herman has, of course, outraged femi-nazis with her book (and it's sequel, Dear Eva Herman, a collection of responses from women who were relived to admit that professional success didn't make up for the loss of family life), which, as it's title says, leads towards a "New Feminity." That would be good feminism.
Feminism fights thing that hurt women, like pornography and prostitution. Doesn't the destruction of family hurt women too?
Femi-nazi-isim fights the family, and thus, in essence, fights women. Herman knows that. Flanagan knows that. Coulter knows that.
If only everyone else would figure it out.
Labels: Politics
Share: Digg It - del.icio.us - ma.gnolia - StumbleUpon - Seed Newsvine - Facebook - E-mail